🔗 Share this article

The recent US national security strategy offers a misguided view of the European Union. It claims that unrestrained immigration and so-called "progressive" policies pose an grave threat to the continent's identity. Yet, this perspective is based on a serious misinterpretation of the reality. The true danger facing Europe is not cultural but technological and economic backwardness.

A Glaring Growth Divide Between the US and Europe

Statistics paint a sobering contrast. Between 2008 and 2023, US GDP surged by eighty-seven percent, while a mere 13.5% growth for the EU. During this time, European income per person dropped from 76.5% to just 50% of the US level. Remarkably, even Mississippi now has a higher per capita income than major EU nations like Italy and France.

Currently, roughly half of the global top fifty technology firms are American, while a mere four are European.

The Technological Deficit: The Core Problem

This widening disparity stems from stronger productivity growth in the US, fueled by breakthroughs and better use of resources. The landscape of world technology leadership is decidedly US-centric. In the last five decades, 241 US firms have grown into enterprises valued at more than ten billion dollars, versus just 14 in the European continent.

This disparity prompts a pressing question: As the competition for tomorrow's sectors like AI, semiconductors, and quantum computing, where does Europe stand? Experts widely agree it is largely a two-horse race involving the US and China, with Europe entering at a significant disadvantage.

Root Causes of Europe's Technological Lag

A number of major reasons explain this innovation chasm.

• Venture Capital: The US boasts a far deeper and agile system for financing new ventures. The EU has yet to establish a genuine capital markets union, a factor that limits the scale of new firms.
• Regulatory Fragmentation: Complex and divided regulation hinder Europe. A US startup can introduce a service under a single regulatory framework to access a consumer base of over 330 million. The EU, despite a bigger population, is split among 27 different national systems, creating significant market obstacles.
• Cultural Attitudes: Views on risk-taking vary greatly. In parts of Europe, a startup's collapse was historically met with penalties, whereas in the United States, it is often seen as a badge of experience.
• Defense Spending: The US benefits from a tightly woven innovation pipeline linking defense and academia. The continent's chronic underinvestment in military capabilities has eroded its capacity for pioneering research.

A Path Forward: Grounds for Cautious Optimism

Despite these challenges, one can find causes for hope. Policymakers are growing more conscious of the severe threat and have started to propose substantial change. Notable analyses on European competitiveness and the internal market highlight the need for major changes.

Given appropriate policies and regulatory reforms, Europe's strengths could support far greater levels of business-led breakthroughs.

Europe still possesses considerable advantages: skilled human capital, top-tier schools and universities, and premier labs. Alongside a large internal market and substantial household savings, these elements have the potential to trigger a new wave of venture creation.

Crucially, even if the EU does not become the leader in creating next-generation technologies, it can still dramatically increase economic output by implementing and tailoring innovations from elsewhere.

A Critical Juncture

The European Union now faces a decisive moment. To paraphrase a famous line, economic erosion often happens "slowly, then all at once". To date, the continent's technological decline has been steady. However, without decisive action to tackle its structural weaknesses, today's gradual weakening could turn into a rapid and permanent loss of global economic relevance.